“The Role of Lacan’s Theories in Boundary Language”

Quote source – http://art3idea.psu.edu/boundaries/related/lacan.html


” The Role of Lacan’s Theories in Boundary Language

The French psychologist Jacques Lacan astounded audiences who came to his lectures during the 1950s with lectures that some in the audience were not sure were entirely in French. An official and willing outcast of the Congrés des psychanalystes de langue française, Lacan called into question many of the principles that had made the writings of Freud the basis of a world-wide professional practice. His formulations of classical Freudian concepts as the ego, desire, the Oedipus complex were re-mixed with ideas from philosophy, linguistics, political theory, history, and other fields. His two major works in English, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis and Ecrits: A Selection, are difficult to read but tantalizing, especially for artists, architects, writers, and critical theorists who see in Lacan a return to the complexities that have always characterized the arts and artists, cultures and cultural practices. Mirrors, anamorphosis, screens, and illusions abound. The primary representative of the subject in the public world is, first and foremost, a confirmed liar. In short, Lacan’s theory of mind is a theory of art as well.

Why is this? Profoundly, Lacan treats matters where drawing boundaries and making distinctions is critical and complex. The world we might draw on a sheet of paper is ‘transitive’ — spaces separated on one side or the other remain there, unconnected except by their common border. In truth, Lacan demonstrated through his analogies of mirrors, knots, and puzzles, the spaces and times disconnected symbolically return in the experience of the ‘Real’, through passageways that resemble the turn-of-the-century mystical concept of the fourth dimension. Yet, Lacan uses nary a mystical idea, as Jung had done, to suggest a synchronicity of archetypes stretching across centuries and cultures. Universality, Lacan stresses, comes from the fact that we all have mothers and fathers, and a sequence of stages that must be undergone to establish our place in a civil/social world. Because these stages involve the perceptual world and its meaning, Lacan’s psychology is intrinsically a groundwork for any approach to architecture, art, and place.

Boundary language interprets Lacan through the writings of Slavoj Zizek, the Slovenian polymath who studied with Jacques-Alain Miller, Lacan’s son-in-law and intellectual heir. Zizek takes Lacan, Freud, and others (including Hegel and Schelling) to popular culture. Using examples from films and popular fiction, Zizek finds clear articulation of the mind’s topological twists in the jokes, thrills, and tears of fiction. Two of his favorites, Alfred Hitchcock and Kzrysztof Kieslowski, get book-length treatment, and Michel Chion’s film-based theories of sound (voix acousmatique) are featured throughout. Zizek’s ability to range across disciplines, cultures, ideologies, and other lines drawn since the Enlightenment to separate the projects of the intellect run parallel to boundary language’s aspiration to find a single topology to cover a wide array of phenomena. This topology resembles Lacan’s own ‘triangle’ of SYMBOLIC-REALITY-REAL. This triangle distinguishes these fundamental functions, but it also establishes a system of circulation that ‘is’, more or less, the human being. Like the intransitive topology that characterizes the joke, the paradox, and idiological domination, this ‘flow-chart’ operates in a complex multidimensional space that defies Cartesian divisibility.

Zizek is the (unsolicited) ‘philosopher of boundary language’ because he is able to show Lacan’s effectiveness in examples of popular culture. In often surprising ways, the topics of anamorphosis, acousmatics, knots, and repetitions lace through Zizek’s books in ways that make all of them, even those overtly ‘about’ theology, relevant to any discussion of boundary behavior.

Quote source – http://art3idea.psu.edu/boundaries/related/lacan.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s